Sasha Banks & Naomi Controversy: All You Need To Know about this row with WWE
What happened this week on Monday Night Raw has given life to a few weeks of authentic transition from WWE until reaching Money in The Bank.
That suggests that the company and those involved have worked on something intentional.
I don’t think so, but there are many people, even people who have been working on the production team, like Road Dogg, who do think so, especially after reading the WWE statement.
Now let’s put ourselves in the situation that everything they say happened was real, that.
Sasha Banks got angry with Vince McMahon, that the two fighters were frustrated.
By the treatment of the tag team division, that The Boss was going to lose against Ronda Rousey and that Naomi was going to lose.
Also Read:Â WWE SmackDown: Sasha Banks surprises a Brooklyn high school fight club
Against Bianca Belair, and that a producer called them ‘spoiled’ for requesting a meeting with Vince McMahon on more than one occasion in the same afternoon.
If we put ourselves in that situation, analyzing who is making a mistake in this matter is very complicated. We lack information.
We do not know exactly who said what, at what exact moment Sasha Banks and Naomi’s reactions occurred, if there was actually a communication failure.
Between the production team and Vince McMahon before the Six Pack Challenge.
She was announced or what exactly does it say in your contract of the two superstars.
And yes, I mention the contract because, above all, Naomi and Sasha Banks have been subjected to a popular judgment on whether they did the right thing.
If they did wrong in leaving and -and this is what I have read the most on social networks- if they acted badly on a ‘professional’ level.
In the world we live in, the word “professional” has been distorted at different levels.
Some believe that they can believe they are professionals in something simply because of their dedication and others think that.
Being a professional in the sports field means that you must obey a figure who manages an organization, with no option to reply.
A movie actor usually asks to review a script before accepting a proposal under a confidentiality clause. Sometimes they accept, sometimes they don’t, but they have that option.
A professional wrestler is a mixture of athlete and actor. In WWE they have that role and are under guidelines, rules that they have to follow.
I understand that being ‘professionals’ they should accept the role given to them, but they should also have the option to refuse it. Obviously.
Sasha Banks & Naomi Latest News:Â
Also Read:Â WWE News: Sasha Banks carries out a &purge&of WWE on social networks
I have always believed that there should be one or more predominant figures that decide, because a fighter can be a great athlete and actor.
But they can have a bad perception of what is correct and what is not. This is where creatives and managers must enter, and do their job well.
So the question is, did the WWE creatives and/or producer-managers do their job well? Obviously not.
And that point of view is clear to me because WWE had other options on the table. We are talking about a roster (Raw’s).
Also Read:Â WWE News: WWE discards plans for Sasha Banks and Naomi heading to Hell in a Cell
With Becky Lynch, Asuka, Rhea Ripley, Liv Morgan, Shayna Baszler, Sonya Deville or even Lacey Evans. Options that could have occupied the position of applicant.
Without having to go through a Six Pack Challenge with the proposals that were given. I understand that Rhea Ripley and Liv Morgan are another thing.
I understand that Ronda Rousey has no rival on SmackDown in the short term, but that is a creative and foresight problem.
Therefore, we enter a dimension in which both parties could have their reasons and have made their mistakes.
With all the information that has arrived, I understand that – I repeat, if it is real.
Sasha Banks offered to promote the division of couples by leaving the main event, supposedly receiving some promise.
From the management team in terms of having screen time, rivals and offer opportunities to other talents, as would have been the case with Doudrop and Nikki A.S.H.
Some have compared this situation to what could happen with Randy Orton and Riddle in July.
Both are the current champions in pairs and it is rumored that they could be the rivals of Roman Reigns in Money in The Bank and SummerSlam.
I think it is not the same situation. First, because we don’t know if RK-Bro will come to that moment with the titles.
Remember this week’s unification match – and second: Roman Reigns has no viable options, Bianca Belair and Ronda Rousey do.
The WWE women’s tag team division is not working. Since its creation, nobody has really bet on it.
Neither couple has had a long and triumphant reign. Sasha Banks had the intention of changing all that.
But it seems that WWE had once again begun to do the opposite. We all know it, absolutely everyone, but the majority insists on defending the one above.
Instead of supporting the one below. But it is not something casual, it happens daily in life, in politics, in society.
In short, I believe in the hierarchy system in a company, but I also believe that the person at the top will not always be right.
Also Read:Â WWE Raw: Official WWE Statement on Sasha Banks &Naomi
You must listen, and if you don’t listen, a small revolution is always good, someone reminds you that you are not doing things right.
Therefore, whenever Sasha Banks wanted to refuse to work to defend a good reason, I will give her my support.
